Showing 4 results for Bagheri
P Bagheri, B Alesaadi,
Volume 3, Issue 2 (Occupational Medicine Quarterly Journal 2011)
Abstract
Dr E Dortaj Raberi, P Bagheri,
Volume 3, Issue 3 (Occupational Medicine Quarterly Journal 2011)
Abstract
Abstract
Background: This study was designed as an epidemiologic survey on occupational accidents in Marvdasht, Arsanjan and Passargad in a 6 year period.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study which was conducted on occupational accidents occurred between 2005-2010 in all industrial and producial units in Marvdasht, Passargad and Arsanjan. The frequency of accidents was calculated according to the type of accident, time of accident, job, sex, age, marital status, educational status, employment duration, insurance status, nationality and type of activity. Data was analyzed using chi square test.
Results: The highest frequency of accidents occurred in 25-29 years age group (29.75%), the most important cause of accidents was fall (36.82%), the job with the highest frequency of accidents was construction (38.6%), the most frequent time of accidents was in 7-10 AM (31.7%), the most frequent organ involved was hand (29.26%) and the most frequent outcome was injury-fracture-toxicity (65.7%).
Conclusion: According to the results employers and managers should implement research-based educational programs about health, job and management in order to observe the effects of industrial hygiene on the reduction of occupational accidents in the workplace.
M Zarezade, Ms Abolhasani, S Eslami, E Salarikhah, F Bagheri, E Salmani,
Volume 5, Issue 3 (Occupational Medicine Quarterly Journal 2013)
Abstract
Background: Various statistics of the incidence and prevalence of medical errors in hospitals have been published.is common.This study aimed to identify the initial state of the current level of risk management in the hospital was rahnemon.
Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was performed on the nurses of shahid rahnemon hospital. Data collected by the census questionnaire given to all nurses and the number was 250. The 6 scale variable levels of risk management staff to identify, organize the risk management policies status, condition training, risk management, risk management, status monitoring and analysis, risk assessment and control of the 45 questions on a Likert scale of five options are examined. Data 16 SPSS software was analyzed using.
Results: Knowledge workers to manage risk rating 2.40±/18, the state organize risk management rating 2.27±/13, the policies and procedures Score2.17±.0.02, Education Risk Management Rating2.18±./04, the position of Managing Risk Score2.65±./08, monitoring, analyzing, evaluating and controlling risk, rated 2.79±./05to themselves.
Conclusions: According to the obtained scores 6 area of risk management component the overall risk was assessed as weak. Clinical governance systems, developing training programs, adopt and implement policies and procedures in line with current regulatory programs, risk management should be looking seriously at the hospital.
Seyed Yaser Ghelmani, Mohammadreza Mirjalili, Masoud Mirzaei, Behnam Bagheri, Tahereh Fallah, Homa Moazen, Somayeh Gholami, Azam Kabirzadrh, Majid Rasti,
Volume 16, Issue 2 (Occupational Medicine Quarterly Journal 2024)
Abstract
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the greatest focus was on the respiratory system, but recently awareness has increased about the cardiovascular manifestations of the COVID-19 disease and the adverse effect of cardiovascular involvement on its prognosis. Since so far no comprehensive study has investigated electrocardiogram changes in patients with COVID-19 in Iran, the purpose of this study is to assess electrocardiogram changes in adults aged 20-70 with and without a history of COVID-19.
Materials and Methods: The current study was a cohort study conducted on two groups of working people with a history of COVID-19 and controls without a history of COVID-19. The case and control subjects were selected randomly from the participants of the Yazd Health study and the Shahdieh cohort study. ECG was taken from both groups before and after Covid-19 and then QTc interval and ST segment measurements were recorded and interpreted.
Results: In the present study, 77 patients including 45 patients with COVID-19 (58.4%) and 32 non-COVID-19 patients (41.6%) were selected. Heart rate/min before and after COVID-19 was 69.08±10.89 and 73.5±14.05, respectively (P<0.01). There was a non-significant difference before and after COVID-19 in terms of QTi, and QTc (P>0.05).
Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, COVID-19 disease is associated with a change in heart rate in the two studies' participants, but no effect was observed on the parameters of QTi, and QTC. Therefore, it seems that echocardiography is not necessary in patients with COVID-19.
