Volume 14, Issue 1 (Spring 2022)
tkj 2022, 14(1): 57-70 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: با توجه به موضوع و ماهیت پژوهشی که مقاله حاضر از آن استخ
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sabbaghpoor Azarian H, NikooMaram H, mirilavasani M. Identification, analyzing and management of human errors in the filter man job using SHERPA method: A case study of an oil refinery. tkj 2022; 14 (1) :57-70
URL: http://tkj.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-1175-en.html
URL: http://tkj.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-1175-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , hani.nikoo@gmail.com
Abstract: (1028 Views)
Introduction: Nowadays, despite sensitive and complex technologies, Human Error is of great importance in many work environments due to its unfortunate consequences. For this reason, to limit the impacts of human error, it is necessary to identify and find the causes.
Method: The present research was a descriptive-analytic study performed in 2021. After collecting information using the task observation method and interviewing safety officials, unit supervisors, and operators, 16 critical tasks were determined. Then, hierarchical task analysis (HTA) was performed, and human errors in each critical task were identified by the SHERPA method.
Results: By analyzing SHERPA worksheets, 181 human errors were identified. Of these, 154 errors (85%) were of performance type, 24 errors (13%) were visited errors, two errors (1%) were related to communication, and 1 error (1%) was selected. Also, according to the results of the risk assessment, 45 errors (25 %) were unacceptable, 20 errors (11 %) were at an adverse risk level, 81 errors (45 %) were acceptable but needed to reconsider, and 35 errors (19 %) were acceptable without needing to review.
Conclusion: The most obvious errors that occur in the filtration unit of this refinery were related to functional errors. To reduce the occurrence of the detected error, control solutions such as installing an online monitoring system and alarm on the filtration process, the output of wet-dry solvent pumps, and the vacuum pump were presented
Method: The present research was a descriptive-analytic study performed in 2021. After collecting information using the task observation method and interviewing safety officials, unit supervisors, and operators, 16 critical tasks were determined. Then, hierarchical task analysis (HTA) was performed, and human errors in each critical task were identified by the SHERPA method.
Results: By analyzing SHERPA worksheets, 181 human errors were identified. Of these, 154 errors (85%) were of performance type, 24 errors (13%) were visited errors, two errors (1%) were related to communication, and 1 error (1%) was selected. Also, according to the results of the risk assessment, 45 errors (25 %) were unacceptable, 20 errors (11 %) were at an adverse risk level, 81 errors (45 %) were acceptable but needed to reconsider, and 35 errors (19 %) were acceptable without needing to review.
Conclusion: The most obvious errors that occur in the filtration unit of this refinery were related to functional errors. To reduce the occurrence of the detected error, control solutions such as installing an online monitoring system and alarm on the filtration process, the output of wet-dry solvent pumps, and the vacuum pump were presented
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Safety and occupational accidents
Received: 2022/01/13 | Accepted: 2022/05/25 | Published: 2022/05/31
Received: 2022/01/13 | Accepted: 2022/05/25 | Published: 2022/05/31
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
